9th Grade - Gateway 3
Back to 9th Grade Overview
Note on review tool versions
See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.
- Our current review tool version is 2.0. Learn more
- Reports conducted using earlier review tools (v1.0 and v1.5) contain valuable insights but may not fully align with our current instructional priorities. Read our guide to using earlier reports and review tools
Loading navigation...
Usability
Gateway 3 - Meets Expectations | 96% |
|---|---|
Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports | 8 / 9 |
Criterion 3.2: Assessment | 10 / 10 |
Criterion 3.3: Student Supports | 6 / 6 |
Criterion 3.4: Intentional Design |
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 9 meet the criteria for instructional supports and usability. Materials include annotations in each lesson to support and guide teachers with enacting the curriculum. Materials explain complex concepts and include explanations of cross-curricular content beyond the current course, when necessary. Materials use the language of the CCSS in learning objectives but do not explain the role of the standards in the context of the series. Materials provide some strategies for informing stakeholders about the ELA program but do not contain suggestions for how parents or caregivers can help support student progress and achievement. The Program Guide includes detailed descriptions of instructional approaches that relate to all strands of the standards and references a host of reading research. Materials include a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support the instructional activities. Materials include a publisher-provided standards correlation document that identifies the CCSS at the unit level and for each Section Diagnostic and Culminating Task. Each unit contains an Evaluation Plan, which outlines how instructors can monitor, diagnose, and evaluate student performance. The Teaching Notes in the Teacher Edition provide suggestions for monitoring student performance, including next steps for students’ literacy skill development. Materials utilize various modalities and item types, including written tasks and oral presentations; and discussion questions, constructed response questions, project-based tasks, and research portfolios. While the font size can be increased on assessments, materials do not provide guidance on the use of this accommodation. Materials include embedded instructional supports and differentiation strategies to support students in special populations. Differentiation Strategy sections include questions that extend above grade-level students’ thinking about the texts they read and develop their ideas in a more advanced way to maximize their learning experiences. The program design allows students to make choices about their learning and research. Students and teachers can monitor student learning through formative and summative assessment opportunities, including peer reviews and discussions, teacher feedback on Section Diagnostics, and self-reflection on the culminating tasks. Materials utilize various grouping strategies for students, including individual work with the teacher, pairs/partners, small groups, research teams, and whole group; and include teacher guidance on grouping students in a variety of formats. Teaching Notes in the Teacher Edition provide options and strategies for supporting English learners. Student-facing materials include embedded supports. Students have frequent opportunities to engage in peer discussions using Tier 2 academic vocabulary. Most materials and assessments depict individuals of different genders, races, ethnicities, and other physical characteristics. Materials offer a wide variety of texts and topics that balance information of different demographics. Materials work to maintain a balance of positive portrayals in representation to prevent the prevalence of negative stereotypes harmful to students. Materials do not provide suggestions and strategies to use the home language to support students in learning ELA. Teacher materials do not include guidance on how to garner information that will aid in learning, including the family’s preferred language of communication, schooling experiences in other languages, literacy abilities in other languages, and previous exposure to academic or everyday English. Although materials specify assets that should be leveraged, materials do not provide sufficient opportunities for teachers to draw upon student home language or for students to develop home language literacy. Materials miss opportunities to capitalize on the diverse cultural and social backgrounds of students. Learning goals and instructional activities do not consistently leverage students’ cultural and social backgrounds. Opportunities for students to feel acknowledged during tasks based on customs of other cultures or sections of the materials provided in multiple languages are lacking. Materials include teacher guidance on how to engage culturally diverse students in the learning of ELA. Materials include a Remote Learning Guide with details to assist educators, including but not limited to: monitoring student learning, establishing a remote classroom culture, and technology solutions to facilitate virtual instruction. Local customization for asynchronous and synchronous learning is available. The Teaching Notes in the Teacher Edition and student-facing materials include guidance when teachers and students collaborate using digital tools. Materials largely use Google Docs for collaboration and the Remote Learning Guide also references digital technology, such as Zoom, Padlet, and FlipGrid, that offers opportunities for collaboration and helps facilitate discussions. The visual design of the materials is not distracting and should support student learning and engagement. The layout of the materials is consistent across units and grade levels. Organizational features (Table of Contents, glossary, index, internal references, table headers, captions, etc.) in the materials are clear, accurate, and mostly error-free. The Teacher Edition, and when applicable the Teaching Notes, provide guidance on the use of technology to support and enhance student learning.
Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports
The program includes opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize materials with integrity and to further develop their own understanding of the content.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 9 meet the criteria for teacher planning and learning.
Materials provide teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials to support students’ literacy development. Materials contain adult-level explanations of the more complex grade-level concepts, as well as concepts beyond the current course, supporting teachers with improving their own knowledge of the subject. Materials use the language of the CCSS in learning objectives but do not explain the role of the standards in the context of the series. Materials provide some strategies for informing stakeholders about the ELA program but do not contain suggestions for how parents or caregivers can help support student progress and achievement. The Program Guide explains the instructional approaches of the program and references research-based strategies utilized throughout the program. Materials include a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support the instructional activities.
Indicator 3a
Materials provide teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials to support students' literacy development.
The materials reviewed for Grade 9 meet the criteria for Indicator 3a.
Across the school year, the Teacher Edition includes guidance in the Teaching Notes. Teaching Notes categories are as follows: Teaching Strategies and Decisions; About the Author, Concept, Text, Topic; and Student Support and Differentiation. Materials include a Literacy Toolbox for students and teachers. This resource provides both teachers and students support and scaffolds for teaching and growing literacy development and includes a wide range of Reference Guides and Tools, including, but not limited to, Annotating and Note-Taking Reference Guide, Delineating Arguments Tool, and Forming Evidence-Based Claims Tool. The Program Guide details the Guiding Principles, Program Design, Unit Components, Instructional Approaches, Support for Students with Diverse Learning Needs, Bias & Sensitivity, and Website Guidance. The Course-at-a-Glance also provides a descriptive snapshot of the program’s overall structure with several suggestions for yearlong pathways.
Materials provide teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials to support students’ literacy development. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Materials provide comprehensive guidance that will assist teachers in presenting the student materials and ancillary materials.
In the Program Guide, materials explain the function of the Teaching Notes section, “All units contain robust teaching notes that support teachers by providing important content and pedagogical information. The teaching notes are organized into three categories, About the Author, Concept, Text, Topic; Teaching Strategies and Decisions; and Student Support and Differentiation.” Materials offer content and pedagogical information. For example, in the Application Unit, Section 1, Lesson 1, the Teaching Notes provide insight into the importance of vocabulary instruction for ESL learners:
“These opportunities provide students, particularly English learners, a tremendous chance to increase their cognitive academic language proficiency (CALP). Often, students, particularly English learners, employ basic interpersonal communicative skills (BICS).”
Materials present opportunities for teachers to expand their knowledge of what these skills are and how they can support them in the classroom.
In the Program Guide, materials provide teacher guidance on the Reference Guides available to students. Student-facing materials include reminders to utilize the Reference Guides, and these reminders are also included in the Teaching Notes. One example includes Reference Guides that support writing, such as Connecting Ideas, Conventions, Integrating Quotations, Organization, and Style. The guides “include definitions, descriptions, and examples of sundry conventions and language usage concepts. For example, the Connecting Ideas Reference Guide includes descriptions of the purpose and effects of transitions and a table highlighting ‘Transition Words and Phrases.’ The Integrating Quotations Reference Guide offers students examples of how to incorporate, and respectively credit, the work of others into their own writing.”
Materials include sufficient and useful annotations and suggestions that are presented within the context of the specific learning objectives.
In the Foundation Unit, Who Changes the World?, Section 2, Lesson 5, students use a Reference Guide to determine the credibility of sources. The Teacher Edition includes Teaching Notes with Teaching Strategies and Decisions, such as “If students need additional support with assessing sources, you might direct them to the Assessing Sources Reference Guide. You might define credibility and credible source for students (believable, fair, trustworthy).”
In the Development Unit, Photojournalism, Section 2, Lesson 4, students do a close reading of a passage and use the Section 2 Question Set. In the teacher-facing notes for this activity, guidance notes that students can use the Visual Analysis Tool or Forming Evidence-Based Claims Tool for extra support. Materials also provide information about the author to aid in instruction, and teacher guidance also suggests using vocabulary lists from prior chapters to support instruction.
In the Development Unit, Romeo and Juliet, Section 1, Lesson 6, students read Lines 1–105 of Act 1, Scene 1 of Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare. The Teaching Notes in the Teacher Edition include About the Author, Concept, Text, Topic notes which state, “Note: Lines 1–30 of Act 1, Scene 1 contain lewd jokes. Shakespeare used both high- and low-brow humor in his plays. Students should connect this scene to emerging themes about family relationships, hate, and violence.”
In the Development Unit, The Book of Unknown Americans, Section 4, Lesson 2, Teaching Notes on Teaching Strategies and Decisions to help solidify understanding. A set of questions in the Student Support and Differentiation portion of the Teaching Notes helps teachers diagnose student problems and suggests various tools to support their students, such as the Annotating and Note-Taking Reference Guide.
In the Application Unit, What Do I Want to Research?, Section 3, Lesson 1, Teaching Notes address Teacher Strategies and Decisions and Student Support and Differentiation, such as paring down a student’s list of research options for them to digest the project better and make progress. In Lesson 4, students learn how to provide parenthetical citations for the sources of information and quotations they use. The Teaching Edition includes Teaching Notes on Student Support and Differentiation which states, “If students struggle citing evidence, consider modeling different citation examples with a model source and text.”
Indicator 3b
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level/course-level concepts and concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.
The materials reviewed for Grade 9 meet the criteria for Indicator 3b.
The explanation and examples help build teacher understanding to ensure teachers provide the necessary support for students throughout the lessons. Materials provide additional tools that teachers can use beyond current offerings in the course materials, such as K-W-L protocols and Notice and Wonder tables. Materials also include teacher guidance on film analysis to support students with this concept, and provide specific background information on instructional concepts.
Materials provide a teacher’s edition that contains full, adult-level explanations and examples, when necessary, of the more advanced concepts so that teachers can improve their knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade/course-level concepts so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.
In the Foundation Unit, Who Changes the World?, Section 1, Lesson 1, the Teaching Notes in the Teacher Edition provide suggestions on other strategies to use when trying to access background information from students:
“Other strategies to activate background knowledge include using the K-W-L protocol or a Notice and Wonder table. The K-W-L (Know, Want to Know, Learn) protocol asks students to identify what they know about the topic at the beginning of the unit, lesson, or activity; generate questions about what they want to know about the topic; and, in the end, determine what they learned about the topic. In a Notice and Wonder table, students take note of parts of the text in one column and write ‘I wonder’ statements based on those observations in a second column.”
In the Development Unit, Photojournalism, Section 1, Lesson 3, the Teacher Edition includes the following explanation for how teachers can help students who are struggling with finding the central idea: “Are students struggling to determine the central and supporting ideas? If so, they might benefit from the following: engaging in focused annotation and a short discussion (see the Annotating and Note-Taking Reference Guide); rereading the text multiple times using guiding or text-specific questions, each with a different purpose (see the guiding questions in the Questioning Reference Guide for examples of additional text-dependent questions); using a Reading Closely Tool, such as the Attending to Details Tool…”
In the Development Unit, The Book of Unknown Americans, Section 3, Lesson 3, the Teacher Edition provides adult-level explanations for teachers regarding the complex concept of the frame narrative structure. Teacher guidance suggests thinking of the concept as the frame of a house, “The frame of a house determines, for example, how many rooms a house has and how the facade will look; it also provides strength and structure to the building. Students can relate these constructs to how the frame of the phone call to Social Security provides strength and structure to the narrative and how Smith-Yackel used the frame to highlight the exhaustive list of jobs her mother held.”
In the Development Section, Global Food Production, Section 2, Lesson 1, the Teaching Notes in the Teacher Edition explain what the Green Revolution was and point out key details to improve the instructor’s knowledge of the subject:
“The Green Revolution refers to a general time period between 1950 and 1960 in which an increase in technological initiatives in agriculture predominantly impacted countries in the developing world.
Its overall impact was an increase in global food production as a result of new chemical fertilizers, mechanization in agricultural techniques, and developments in irrigation.
[…] Norman Borlaug is often referred to as the father of the Green Revolution.
Various environmental, socioeconomic, and health impacts are often discussed in relation to the Green Revolution, and it has been the object of both praise and criticism.”
In the Application Unit, What Do I Want to Research?, Section 1, Lesson 1, the Teacher Edition leads teachers to use the Application Unit: Teacher Planning Guide to facilitate student learning throughout the Application Unit. An adult-level explanation that is provided in the guide specifies how teachers can guide student research on page 2 of the Application Unit: Teacher Planning Guide. It states, “Students should be encouraged to build on a familiar topic (including those of the foundation and development units) to provide them with a comfortable, and even advanced, starting point. They can draw on their written work and class discussions from earlier units and use their responses to a unit prompt on their Application Unit Potential Topics Tools to determine areas of interest within the topic.”
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.
In the Development Unit, Romeo and Juliet, Section 4, Lesson 2, the Teaching Notes in the Teacher Edition explain the significance of a scene from Franco Zeffirelli’s film adaptation of Romeo and Juliet by pointing out the following:
“In the Zeffirelli film, the mood of the scene starts out humorous and playful with the characters smiling.
The camera shots make it difficult to see the moment that Tybalt stabs Mercutio, but from Tybalt’s facial expression, it was clearly an accident.
From his facial expression, body language, and intonation, the viewer can tell that Romeo clearly wants to kill Tybalt, but Zeffirelli reduces Romeo’s responsibility for the death by having him on the ground, lifting his sword in self-defense when Tybalts runs onto it.
Zeffirelli chooses to interrupt this scene with a short excerpt from the following scene with Juliet, heightening the emotion of the scene.”
Materials provide insight into film analysis to help the instructor improve their own knowledge of the director’s choices to better assist students in their analysis of the film.
Indicator 3c
Materials include standards correlation information that explains the role of the standards in the context of the overall series.
The materials reviewed for Grade 9 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3c.
The Program Guide includes detailed descriptions to assist teachers and students in understanding the program structure, unit types (Foundation, Development, and Application), and assessments. Materials demonstrate coherence between instruction and assessment; teachers can make connections between the skills students are developing and applying over the year to local standards. Materials do not label Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for English Language Arts specifically, nor do materials address the role of the CCSS in the context of the overall series. Each lesson in the student-facing materials includes a Lesson Goal that incorporates the language of the CCSS but does not explicitly cite the CCSS.
Materials provide a teacher’s edition that includes standards correlation information that explains the role of the standards in the context of the overall series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Correlation information is present for the ELA standards addressed throughout the grade level/series.
In the Foundation Unit, Who Changes the World?, Section 4, Lesson 2, students present their Culminating Task or actively listen to and participate in the presentation of their classmates. The Culminating Task Checklist includes evaluation criteria: Reading & Knowledge, Speaking & Listening, and Writing. For example, when students apply Speaking & Listening Goals, they are asked to Communicate Effectively, “How well do I use language and strategies to accomplish my intended purpose in communicating?” Teachers can correlate the evaluation criteria to their local standards. Materials do not specifically cite CCSS.
In the Development Unit, Photojournalism, Section 2, Lesson 3, an example of a Lesson Goal includes: “Can I use language and strategies to accomplish my intended purpose in communicating, especially when presenting as a group?” The student edition contains Lesson Goals in “Can I?” statements to support students with self-evaluating at the end of each lesson. Teachers can correlate the language of the Lesson Goals to the CCSS. Materials do not specifically cite CCSS.
In the Development Unit, Romeo and Juliet, Section 3, Lesson 7, students utilize a Diagnostic Checklist as they write and revise a multiparagraph expository response that demonstrates their understanding and development of the themes found in Acts 1–3 of Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare. The Section Diagnostic provides learning goals, such as Reading & Knowledge Goals, when students summarize, “How well do I express an accurate understanding of themes in literary texts?” Teachers can correlate the language of the learning goals to the CCSS. Materials do not specifically cite CCSS.
In the Development Unit, The Book of Unknown Americans, Section 4, Lesson 2, the teacher encourages students to use the Academic Discussion Reference Guide when they work with partners to discuss quotes they identified as important in the novel The Book of Unknown Americans by Cristina Henriquez. Lesson Goals include: “Can I recognize and interpret important relationships among key details and ideas (characters, setting, tone, point of view, structure, development, etc.) within texts?” and “Can I use connections among details, elements, and effects to make logical deductions about an author’s perspective, purpose, and meaning in texts?” Teachers can correlate the language of the Lesson Goals to the CCSS. Materials do not specifically cite CCSS.
In the Development Unit, Global Food Production, Section 1, Lesson 3, an example of a Lesson Goal includes: “Can I understand the meaning of, and relationships among, key concepts of argumentation, such as perspective, position, claim, evidence, and reasoning, as they apply to a text introducing the concept of food security?” The student-facing materials include Lesson Goals in student friendly language. Teachers can correlate the language of the Lesson Goals to the CCSS. Materials do not specifically cite CCSS.
In the Application Unit, What Do I Want to Research?, Section 5, Lesson 10, students “celebrate our in-depth work by presenting our findings to our classmates.” As a final activity for the grade level, student teams present their research findings or participate as the audience by listening attentively to the other teams’ presentations, taking notes, and considering three questions while observing. One question reads, “What are the most interesting or surprising things you learned from this presentation?” Student grading utilizes items from the Culminating Task Checklist, including Reading & Knowledge, Speaking & Listening, and Writing. One such goal in the Reading & Knowledge section asks students to analyze relationships, “How well do we compare, contrast, and synthesize multiple sources to deepen our understanding of our Central Research Question or inquiry question?” Teachers can correlate the language of the Lesson Goals to the CCSS. Materials do not specifically cite CCSS.
Explanations of the role of the specific grade-level/course-level ELA standards are present in the context of the series.
No evidence found.
Indicator 3d
Materials provide strategies for informing all stakeholders, including students, parents, or caregivers about the program and suggestions for how they can help support student progress and achievement.
Indicator 3e
Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies.
The materials reviewed for Grade 9 meet the criteria for Indicator 3e.
Materials include a Program Guide with a detailed description of Instructional Approaches that relate to the following content: Questioning, Reading, Writing & Presenting, Vocabulary, Grammar & Syntax, Speaking & Listening, and The Literacy Toolbox. The Program Guide also includes an Appendix E: Tools section that lists Instructional Areas and corresponding Tools, such as the Attending to Detail Tool to correspond with Reading Closely. Other notes in Appendix E include information relating to Writing and Organizing, Analyzing Arguments, Research, Vocabulary, and Evaluation.
References for Reading include but are not limited to: Fisher and Frey’s Rigorous Reading: 5 Access Points for Comprehending Complex Texts (2013) and Wiggins’ Understanding by Design (2005). References for Speaking & Listening include Walqui’s Scaffolding the Success of Adolescent English Language Learners (2010) and Zwiers’ Academic Conversations: Classroom Talk that Fosters Critical Thinking and Content Understanding. References for Support for Students with Diverse Learning Needs include but are not limited to Cervetti’s Conceptual Coherence, Comprehension, and Vocabulary Acquisition: A Knowledge Effect?, and Fisher and Frey’s Enhancing RTI: How to Ensure Success with Effective Classroom Instruction & Intervention (2010).
References for the Teaching Notes include but are not limited to: Bransford’s How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School (2000) and Reeves’ Transforming Professional Development into Student Results (2010). References for Writing & Presenting include but are not limited to Dornan’s Within and Beyond the Writing Process in the Secondary English Classroom (2003) and Vermont Writing Collaborative’s Writing for Understanding: Using Backward Design to Help All Students Write Effectively (2008).
Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Materials explain the instructional approaches of the program.
In the Program Guide, materials include a description of Questioning as an approach to secondary literacy instruction. The program uses “questions to frame students’ initial reading, guide students through analysis, and initiate inquiry.” Materials provide additional information relating to the Central Questions, Assessment Questions, Guiding Questions, Student-Generated Questions, Metacognitive Reflective Questions, and Supporting Questions.
In the Program Guide, details relating to Writing include supporting students’ writing skills “not only by analyzing text to develop their own ideas, but also by analyzing and mimicking the writing of others.” Throughout the program, materials consistently include Mentor Sentences and ongoing journals for students to identify exemplars they can emulate and strategies they can incorporate into their own pieces.
In the Program Guide, materials include a description of Vocabulary in the list of Instructional Approaches. The Program Guide states that this curriculum uses vocabulary for high school literacy development, “by providing opportunities for students to expand their word knowledge that they can call on in speech and writing.” Additional information is available relating to the Supporting Vocabulary: Tools & Reference Guides, Critical Thinking & Analytical Tools, and Reference Guides.
In the Program Guide, materials list Grammar & Syntax under the Instructional Approaches. The Program Guide states that through the high-school literacy instruction, “students are given opportunities to explore and mimic grammar, syntax, and usage in text.” The Program Guide also states that Grammar & Syntax are examined in context, and “Grammar is examined with the goal of improving students’ reading and writing skills.” Materials further note, “Students are given opportunities to deconstruct, examine, and mimic grammar, syntax, and usage they see in a text.” The Program Guide includes the following headings under Grammar & Syntax: Mentor Sentences;, Supporting Grammar & Syntax: Tools & Reference Guides; Critical Thinking & Analytical Tools, which include the Language Use Handouts and Working with Mentor Sentences Tool; and various Reference Guides, which include the Connecting Ideas Reference Guide, and Integrating Quotations Reference Guide.
In the Program Guide, materials list Speaking and Listening as an Instructional Approach included in the high school literacy program. The Program Guide states, “Throughout the units, students speak to, and hear from, their peers formally and informally.” The Program Guide also notes, “Academic conversations are linchpins in literacy development.” Materials include Academic Conversations in many lessons throughout the course. Students and teachers can access Supporting Speaking & Listening: Tools & Reference Guides and Critical Thinking & Analytical Tools, including the Philosophical Chairs Discussion Tool and an Academic Discussion Reference Guide.
Materials include and reference research-based strategies.
In the Program Guide, materials emphasize the importance of students reading “for depth and breadth, allowing for students to build the stamina to read one text deeply, critically, and closely or several texts to build a robust body of knowledge.” The Program Guide includes detailed descriptions of the following: “Depth: Closely Reading for Nuanced Understanding” and “Breadth: Wide Reading for Content and World Language.”
In the Program Guide, materials include details relating to tools available, as well as the use of scaffolding, drawing on research to support student performance during academic discourse. Materials state, “Students are provided a suite of tools, materials, and resources to support their learning, including sentence frames and conversation starters.” The tools students use, such as the Academic Discussion Reference Guide in the Literacy Toolbox, provide a number of Discussion Stems that students can use based on their role in the discussion. These include, but are not limited, to stems when exploring a topic, opinion, or argument and stems when encouraging others to share their thoughts, such as, “How did you come to that idea? We haven’t heard you share yet. Do you agree or disagree with _____?” Materials identify scaffolding as a best practice when teachers work with students who are learning English as an additional language.
Indicator 3f
Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.
The materials reviewed for Grade 9 meet the criteria for Indicator 3f.
The Literacy Toolbox includes a comprehensive list of Reference Guides and Tools needed to complete activities throughout the course. Student-facing materials and Teacher Edition Teaching Notes also reference these tools and guides throughout the unit. The Materials tab for each unit, section, and lesson, includes a list of materials. The Text Overview tab includes a comprehensive list of texts needed for the unit.
Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Materials include a tab titled Materials throughout each unit, section, and lesson. According to the Program Guide, the Materials tab includes a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities: “The Materials tab houses documents specific to the unit, including the Evaluation Plan, Text Overview (teacher-facing), Unit Text List (student-facing), Culminating Task Checklist, and any other relevant documents.”
Materials include a Text Overview at the beginning of each unit which provides a comprehensive list of texts that will be used throughout the unit. The Program Guide includes the following note regarding the Text Overview: “The Text Overview tab contains the unit’s Text Overview (PDF), which identifies the texts used in the unit and includes recommendations for independent choice reading texts.”
Materials include a Literacy Toolbox for each unit which contains a list of Tools and resources that teachers can use to support student learning for each unit. The Program Guide includes the following information to describe the contents of the Literacy Toolbox for each unit: “Key to HSLP instruction is the Literacy Toolbox, composed of graphic organizers (tools), rubrics, checklists, and reference guides, carefully designed to support student success throughout the learning process in all units. Each unit has content or text-specific materials to support reading, writing, speaking, and listening activities pertinent to the unit’s text or topic, as well as instructional sequences.”
In the Foundation Unit, Who Changes the World?, Section 2, Lesson 2, Activity 2, materials listed in student-facing materials and the Teacher Edition Teaching Notes include the Change Agents Note-Taking Tool.
In the Development Unit, Romeo and Juliet, Section 2, Lesson 2, materials listed include: Romeo and Juliet Vocabulary List, Vocabulary Journal, and the Academic Discussion Reference Guide to record and discuss the terms adapt, enhance, and detract in William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet.
In the Development Unit, Global Food Production, Section 4, Lesson 2, materials listed include the Organizing Evidence Tool to help record evidence, claims, and counterclaims students find in the resources they collect for their Culminating Task.
Indicator 3g
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Indicator 3h
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Criterion 3.2: Assessment
The program includes a system of assessments identifying how materials provide tools, guidance, and support for teachers to collect, interpret, and act on data about student progress towards the standards.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 9 meet the criteria for assessment.
Materials include a system of assessments that provide tools, guidance, and support for teachers to collect, interpret, and act on data about student progress towards the standards. Materials include a publisher-provided standards correlation document that identifies the CCSS at the unit level and for each Section Diagnostic and Culminating Task. Each unit contains an Evaluation Plan, which outlines how instructors can monitor, diagnose, and evaluate student performance. Materials utilize various modalities and item types. While the font size can be increased on assessments, materials do not provide guidance on the use of this accommodation.
Indicator 3i
Assessment information is included in the materials to indicate which standards are assessed.
The materials reviewed for Grade 9 meet the criteria for Indicator 3i.
Materials incorporate Common Core State Standards (CCSS) language teachers can identify and correlate to local standards. The publisher-provided standards correlation document identifies CCSS at the unit level and for each Section Diagnostic and Culminating Task. Materials provide teachers with opportunities to examine and assess student growth on the Learning Goals in each unit, including opportunities for formative assessment, Section Diagnostics, and unit Culminating Tasks. Assessment rubrics and supporting materials, such as the Culminating Task Checklists, provide general descriptions and categories (Exceeds Expectations, Meets Expectations, or Below Expectations) relating to student performance in Reading & Knowledge Goals, Writing Goals, and Speaking & Listening Goals.
Assessment information is included in the materials to indicate which standards are assessed. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Materials consistently identify the standards and practices assessed for formal assessments.
The publisher provides a CCSS alignment spreadsheet to identify standards addressed in each unit’s Section Diagnostic and Culminating Task.
In the Foundation Unit, Who Changes the World?, Section 3, Lesson 6, students refine and revise their Section 1 Diagnostics to demonstrate how their understanding of a change agent expanded or changed after reading additional texts. Learning goals incorporate language of the standards, and the Section Diagnostic Checklist includes Writing Goals, such as the following for Organize Ideas:
“How well do I sequence and group sentences and paragraphs and use devices, techniques, descriptions, reasoning, evidence, and visual elements to establish coherent, logical, and well-developed narratives, explanations, and arguments?”
In the Development Unit, Photojournalism, Section 3, Lesson 10, students have the opportunity to revise their Section 1 Diagnostic by responding to teacher comments, evaluation, and feedback. The Section Diagnostic Checklist includes Reading & Knowledge Goals, such as the following for Gather and Organize Evidence:
“How well do I gather and organize relevant and sufficient evidence to demonstrate my understanding of the texts and topics of this section, as well as the task posed by the question in the Section Diagnostic?”
In the Development Unit, Romeo and Juliet, Section 5, Lesson 2, students utilize a Culminating Task Planning Guide that incorporates language that connects to grade-level standards, including, but not limited to:
“Determine Your Focus: Determine the theme you will trace and whether the director choices in each film enhance or detract from the development of that theme.”
Indicator 3j
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities throughout the grade, course, and/or series to determine students' learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance and suggestions for follow-up.
The materials reviewed for Grade 9 meet the criteria for Indicator 3j.
The Teacher Edition and unit materials include guidance on the assessment system. Materials also include assessment guidance in documents such as the unit Evaluation Plan, which outlines how instructors can monitor, diagnose, and evaluate student performance. Each unit includes multiple formative assessments, such as Section Diagnostics, and summative assessments in the form of Culminating Tasks. Each Section Diagnostic provides ongoing opportunities for student reflection, and both the Section Diagnostics and Culminating Tasks include tools which students can use to track their performance. The Teaching Notes in the Teacher Edition provide suggestions for monitoring student performance, including next steps for students’ literacy skill development.
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities throughout the grade, course, and/or series to determine students’ learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance and suggestions for follow-up. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students’ learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance.
In the Development Unit, Photojournalism, Section 3, Lesson 8, students complete a Section Diagnostic in which they compose a multiparagraph response addressing the following question: “How did the photojournalism of Charles Moore and others push the agenda of civil rights leaders into public discourse and serve as a catalyst for change?” Before completing the response, students review the Section 3 Diagnostic Checklist and review their Learning Logs to look at previous activities’ responses to help them address the Section Diagnostic prompt. Teaching Notes in the Teacher Edition suggest that teachers “check on students individually, answering questions and prompting students to be specific in their answers to the questions[, and] encourage them to think about the connection of images to rhetorical appeals.” In Lesson 9, as students reflect on their Section Diagnostic, Teaching Notes in the Teacher Edition explain many ways of collecting and interpreting student performance, specifically:
“You may want to have students complete this metacognitive activity in class so you can gather feedback from several students regarding what they have learned and what they still need to learn.
You might want to create a visible class tracker for each class, noting student learning along the way.
Academic feedback should provide students with relevant information in the midst of their learning process, including concrete ideas of how to improve their skills.”
In the Development Unit, Romeo and Juliet, Unit Overview, Materials Tab, the Evaluation Plan Document outlines the many opportunities that teachers have to assess student learning: “The unit includes a variety of formal and informal opportunities designed to assess student learning and performance: a Culminating Task, which is the final, summative assessment for the unit; Section Diagnostics, which are formative assessment opportunities to track student progress toward the Culminating Task; and informal opportunities in each lesson to monitor student performance.”
In the Application Unit, the materials provide an Evaluation Plan to help instructors monitor student progress throughout the unit. The materials explain the function of the Evaluation Plan:
“This document identifies the unit’s Culminating Task, its Section Diagnostics, and the subsequent lessons and activities that provide practice and enrichment opportunities for students whose performance on diagnostics indicates a need for continued monitoring or additional targeted support.”
The Evaluation Plan outlines how to monitor, diagnose, and evaluate student performance and outlines goals in reading, writing, and listening and speaking for the unit.
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students’ learning and suggestions to teachers for following-up with students.
In the Foundation Unit, Who Changes the World?, Section 1, Lesson 9, students work on the Section 1 Diagnostic in which they write a multi-paragraph response on change agents. The Teacher Edition provides guidance on how teachers can determine student learning and provide follow-up for students who are struggling on a specific aspect of the assessment: “Sentence frames can also be a useful scaffolding for all students, regardless of ability range and are particularly useful for English learners…If you observe trends in students’ misapplication of writing techniques, you might consider planning a mini writing activity to address the issue in the next lesson.”
In the Development Unit, Global Food Production, Section 2, Lesson 2, students read and annotate “Chapter 3: Moving Up the Food Chain,” an excerpt from Full Planet, Empty Plates: The New Geopolitics of Food Scarcity by Lester R. Brown, W.W. Norton & Company. Students determine how the authors support their claims. The Teacher Edition provides guidance for teachers to interpret and support student learning: “If students still seem confused about the difference between an argument and evidence, pull an example from the chapter so they have an idea about what to look for. Claim: ‘The type of animal protein that people choose to eat depends heavily on geography’ (Brown 25). Evidence: ‘Countries that are land-rich with vast grasslands—including the United States, Brazil, Argentina, and Russia—depend heavily on beef or—as in Australia and Kazakhstan—mutton’ (Brown 25).”
Indicator 3k
Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series.
The materials reviewed for Grade 9 meet the criteria for Indicator 3k.
Materials utilize various modalities and item types for student assessments. Section Diagnostics and Culminating Tasks in the Foundation and Development Units range in modality from written tasks to discussions to oral presentations. Item types include discussion questions, constructed response questions, project-based tasks, and research portfolios. Section Diagnostics and the Culminating Task in the Application Unit use the same modalities and item types across each grade level— a problem-based research portfolio and an oral presentation.
Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Foundation Unit, Who Changes the World?, students complete three Section Diagnostics which lead to the end-of-unit Culminating Task. During the Section 1 Diagnostic, students write an expository response to the following question: “What is a change agent?” During the Section 2 Diagnostic, students participate in a Socratic Seminar, using evidence from “Agents of Change” by Phil Patton, as well as other texts read during the unit. Guiding questions include: “What are the qualities of a change agent? How do change agents impact their communities? What conditions allow change to occur?” During the Section 3 Diagnostic, students “Refine and revise your Section 1 Diagnostic to demonstrate how your understanding of a change agent expanded or changed after reading additional texts.” During the Culminating Task, students work in groups to “Collaboratively research, create, and deliver a presentation about change agents.” Afterwards, students individually write a narrative in which they reflect on their research process.
In the Development Unit, Photojournalism, students complete four Section Diagnostics which lead to the end-of-unit Culminating Task. During the Section 1 Diagnostic, students write an evidence-based, multi-paragraph expository response to the following question: “How do photographs and photojournalism influence politics?” During the Section 2 Diagnostic, students participate in a Socratic Seminar, responding to questions such as: “What is the role of photojournalism in constructing the way in which viewers catalog and remember history? How does photojournalism shape the events it documents? How did the work of photojournalists Robert Capa, Gerda Taro, and others in the midst of the Spanish Civil War and World War II shape or change viewers’ perspectives of the history of those events?” During the Section 3 Diagnostic, students write a multi-paragraph expository response to the following question: “How did the photojournalism of Charles Moore and others push the agenda of civil rights leaders into public discourse and serve as a catalyst for change?” During the Section 4 Diagnostic, students write an expository response to the following question: “Does the image Falling Man successfully define a significant aspect of 9/11? In other words, is the image an important, albeit disturbing, image, or is it in poor taste?” During the Culminating Task, students write an expository essay in which they “[explain] and [analyze] how photojournalism highlights and defines important moments in history and culture.”
In the Development Unit, Romeo and Juliet, students complete four Section Diagnostics which lead to the end-of-unit Culminating Task. During the Section 1 Diagnostic, students write a one-paragraph literary analysis “that identifies a theme and how it is developed in Act 1 of Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare.” During the Section 2 Diagnostic, students participate in a Socratic Seminar and “analyze how the directors’ choices enhance or detract from the thematic ideas in Romeo and Juliet and capture the discussions in your Discussion Tool.” During the Section 3 Diagnostic, students write and revise a multi-paragraph literary analysis, citing textual evidence, in response to the following questions: “What is a theme from Act 1 that is further developed in Acts 2 and 3? How is that theme developed?” During the Section 4 Diagnostic, students engage in a Philosophical Chairs Discussion “in which you take a position by defending or countering a claim about the directors’ choices in transforming Romeo and Juliet.” During the Culminating Task, students “Write a literary analysis in which you explain how the directors’ choices in their adaptations enhance or detract from the development of a theme in the play.”
In the Application Unit, What Do I Want to Research, students complete four Section Diagnostics which lead to the end-of-unit Culminating Task. During each of the Section Diagnostics, “students submit their research portfolio to receive feedback on elements of their research project, such as their research questions, pertinent research tools, analysis of sources, and draft presentation materials.” During the Culminating Task, students work in research groups and “use the research portfolio you have built over the course of the unit to develop a presentation for your learning community that shares your findings and conclusions.”
Indicator 3l
Assessments offer accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment.
Criterion 3.3: Student Supports
The program includes materials designed for each student’s regular and active participation in grade-level/grade-band/series content.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 9 meet the criteria for student supports.
Materials are designed for each child’s regular and active participation in grade-level content. Teacher- and student-facing materials include embedded instructional supports and differentiation strategies to support students in special populations; students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level; and English learners. The program design allows students to make choices about their learning and research. Students and teachers can monitor student learning through formative and summative assessment opportunities. While materials provide a balance of images or information about people, representing various demographic and physical characteristics, materials do not provide sufficient opportunities for teachers to draw upon student home language or for students to develop home language literacy. Materials also miss opportunities to capitalize on the diverse cultural and social backgrounds of students.
Indicator 3m
Materials provide strategies and supports for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English language arts and literacy.
The materials reviewed for Grade 9 meet the criteria for Indicator 3m.
The Program Guide includes detailed guidance for teachers when supporting diverse learning needs. Materials include supports that assist students with accessing grade-level content. Examples of supports embedded into instruction include Reading Closely and Note-Taking Tools. The program consistently provides Teaching Notes in the Teacher Edition with strategies to support students and differentiate when necessary. Reference Guides also “provide centralized resources for literacy concepts and processes and offer vocabulary, sentence starters, and other writing support.”
Materials regularly provide strategies and supports for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English language arts and literacy. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Materials regularly provide strategies, supports, and resources for students in special populations to support their regular and active participation in grade-level literacy work.
In the Foundation Unit, Who Changes the World?, Section 2, Lesson 5, students learn a protocol for goal setting and evaluation of progress. The Teaching Notes in the Teacher Edition provide opportunities for student support and differentiation, including questions for the teacher to reflect on and use to make instructional decisions: “Will students benefit from some examples to help them answer Question 2 about contributing to the group? If so, some examples include: gather more sources; analyze sources; develop claims; determine our task, purpose, and audience; draft our presentation; revise our presentation; edit our presentation; and lead a conference with our teacher.”
In the Development Unit, Global Food Production, Section 1, Lesson 1, students examine some places where food is produced by looking at a series of photos using a Visual Analysis Tool that depicts how food is grown, harvested, and processed throughout the U.S. The Teaching Notes in the Teacher Edition provide student support and differentiation guidance around the suite of tools and resources students will utilize: “These tools help students develop and internalize analytical processes. Since they are scaffolds, they can be assigned at your discretion, or students might develop their own system for using them if they encounter difficult sections of text.” Materials emphasize the importance of students learning to “draw on tools from the Literacy Toolbox as they learn to recognize their own proficiencies and needs for specific supports, given the specific demands of text or tasks.”
In the Development Unit, Photojournalism, Section 2, Lesson 10, students prepare for the Socratic Seminar for the Section Diagnostic. The Teaching Notes in the Teacher Edition include the following strategy to support special populations during the Section Diagnostic: “Allow some differentiation by having higher-level students work individually. Pair struggling students with those who have at least medium ability to help their partners formulate thoughts and responses to the questions.”
In the Application Unit, What Do I Want to Research?, Section 2, Lesson 3, students conduct research and gather resources for their Culminating Task. The Teaching Notes in the Teacher Edition give opportunities for students who struggle with the content and those who may be more advanced:
“At this early point in their research, students still use the Potential Sources Tool to support their developing ability to assess sources for usefulness. Students who have already internalized and can apply the process of the tool might find it cumbersome. For these students, consider introducing them early to the more advanced Research Note-Taking Tool, which is introduced to the entire class in the following lesson.”
Indicator 3n
Materials regularly provide extensions to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level.
The materials reviewed for Grade 9 meet the criteria for Indicator 3n.
The Teaching Notes in the Teacher Edition include sections dedicated to student support and differentiation, including considerations for working with students performing above grade-level expectations. These sections include questions that extend students’ thinking about the texts they read and develop their ideas in a more advanced way to maximize their learning experiences.
Materials regularly provide extensions to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Materials provide multiple opportunities for advanced students to investigate the grade-level content at a higher level of complexity. Materials are free of instances of advanced students doing more assignments than their classmates.
In the Program Guide, materials explain, “Student work may reflect the need for extended instruction for many reasons, including that the student may identify as gifted and talented.” The Program Guide provides examples of how this is offered to students:
“Students are encouraged to experiment with their own writing styles and structures on assessments.
Students are given opportunities to lead small groups and teams.
Students are encouraged to make metaphorical connections for newly acquired vocabulary.
Students are encouraged to make concrete and conceptual connections between texts or topics in one unit, to text and topics in different units, and across other disciplines.
Students are encouraged to develop their own note-taking habits and styles if they no longer need the support offered on tools.
Students can draw on tools from the Literacy Toolbox as they learn to recognize their own proficiencies and needs for specific supports, given the specific demands of text or tasks.
Students are encouraged to pursue their own interests at their own pace in the Foundation and Application units.
Students are encouraged to pursue independent reading options with texts written at a complexity level above the grade-level expectation.”
In the Foundation Unit, Who Changes the World?, Section 1, Lesson 8, students explore the periodic sentence and examine Mentor Sentences to see how sentence structure can have an impact on writing and speaking. In the Teaching Notes in the Teacher Edition, the materials explain that if students master the content quickly, they can create examples that move beyond the model presented: “For example, if students conceptually understand that a semicolon links independent clauses, you might encourage them to use a semicolon to link more than two independent clauses for effect.” In Section 2, Lesson 8, students read and annotate the introductions to Malcolm Gladwell’s “The Tipping Point” and Phil Patton’s “Agents of Change,” and the Teaching Notes in the Teacher Edition suggests, “The two texts vary in text complexity, and you can guide students toward one text over another, if appropriate.” In Section 2, Lesson 11, students can choose between notetaking tools for their independent reading based on their proficiency in analyzing a text:
“[…] some students might continue to use Reading Closely Tools to develop their initial understanding of the text. Others might be ready to make analytical claims about the text. They might use Forming Evidence-Based Claims Tools to assist in such an analysis.”
In the Development Unit, Romeo and Juliet, Section 1, Lessons 4 and 6, students listen to readings of William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet. The Teaching Notes in the Teacher Edition suggest, “As students become more comfortable with the language and familiar with the characters, you might assign them or have them self-select specific roles to read aloud during the lesson.”
In the Development Unit, Global Food Production, Section 2, Lesson 3, students read the texts “How Does Agriculture Change Our Climate?” by Barrett Colombo et al. and “Why Industrial Farms Are Good for the Environment”’ by Jayson Lusk and use the Delineating Arguments Tool to annotate the text. The Teaching Notes in the Teacher Edition have question sets to aid in annotating the text for struggling and advanced students suggesting, “Some students who demonstrate advanced competency might benefit from an additional challenge.” The materials then provide a series of questions the instructor can use:
“Would students benefit from being asked how this text or topic connects to another text or topic they have read in another unit?
Would students benefit from creating analogous relationships?
Would students benefit from a task that requires them to discover the symbolic connection between the text and another concept they have learned in this course or elsewhere?
Would students benefit from explaining their expertise about the text to a group of novices? (e.g., How would you explain this text to a five-year-old?)”
In the Development Unit, Photojournalism, Section 3, Lesson 5, students reread “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. to analyze the author’s use of language. The Teacher Edition provides the following information to provide opportunities for students who may be performing above grade level: “If students master the concepts quickly, you might have them experiment with grammatical rules to create sentences that move beyond the model. For example, if students conceptually understand that a semicolon links independent clauses, you might encourage them to use a semicolon to link independent clauses, for effect.”
In the Development Unit, The Book of Unknown Americans, Section 5, Lesson 5, Activity 2, students participate in a peer-review process to receive feedback on the vignettes they have drafted. The Teacher Edition provides the following information to give students who are performing above grade-level opportunities to extend their learning: “Students who demonstrate more sophisticated writing skills might benefit from having time to complete a more extensive revision of their work, or experimenting with a unique organizational structure or stylistic technique.”
In the Application Unit, What Do I Want to Research?, Section 4, Lesson 2, students conference with the teacher to get feedback to develop the claims for their writing. The Teacher Edition provides the following guidance for students who are performing above expectations: “For students who are highly engaged and working quickly and independently, you can bring additional challenges to their tasks by asking them to think of ways to make their part of their final presentation more exciting and illuminating for their audience.”
Indicator 3o
Materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks over time and variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning with opportunities for students to monitor their learning.
Indicator 3p
Materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.
Indicator 3q
Materials provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards to regularly participate in learning English language arts and literacy.
The materials reviewed for Grade 9 meet the criteria for Indicator 3q.
The Program Guide includes teacher guidance on working with students learning English as an additional language. Materials embed support for English learners within the student-facing materials to help them access complex text and reach grade-level proficiency in reading, writing, speaking, and listening. Teaching Notes in the Teacher Edition outline options and strategies, such as Reference Guides and sentence starters, that teachers may use to support English learners. Attention to academic and Tier 2 vocabulary is evident in the materials, including the Teaching Notes, emphasizing the importance of students learning vocabulary within a meaningful context. Materials provide multiple opportunities for students to engage in discussion with their peers, “often using newly acquired academic and Tier 2 vocabulary with sample discussion stems as support. Through these discussions, English learners are able to strengthen their Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills (BICS) and Cognitive Academic Language Proficiency (CALP).”
Materials provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards to regularly participate in learning English language arts and literacy. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Development Unit, Photojournalism, Section 1, Lesson 3, students utilize a Vocabulary in Context Tool to identify words that are not familiar and work collaboratively. Materials include questions in the Vocabulary in Context Tool to support students with using context to determine the meaning of a word, including but not limited to: “Does the word have a root word? Do I understand what the root word means? Does the author use any words to indicate the unknown word has a nearby synonym (i.e., a word that has the same meaning as the unknown word)?”
The Teaching Notes in the Teacher Edition include reminders such as, “Native English speakers might grasp nuances in contextual clues, such as tone or cultural references, while English learners might not understand, making it all the more difficult for them to define the targeted vocabulary word.” Guidance includes additional details and suggestions on providing student support, such as creating mental images and associations.
In the Development Unit, The Book of Unknown Americans, Section 3, Lesson 3, students listen to and follow along in their text to a read-aloud of the essay “My Mother Never Worked” by Bonnie Smith-Yackel. The student-facing materials provide instructions, including, “As you listen, pay attention to how the author structures the essay and uses dialogue to develop character.” The Teaching Notes in the Teacher Edition include strategies and reminders relating to the read aloud, such as, “English learners in particular benefit from read-alouds, as they can follow text while listening to accurate pronunciation and prosody of language.”
In the Development Unit, Global Food Production, Section 4, Lesson 1, Activity 6, students read Foley’s “A Five-Step Plan To Feed the World,” and then interact with words they defined to cement their understanding of the meaning. Guidance in the student-facing materials directs students to work in pairs to “read through the list and identify words and phrases from the article that you think you understand and ones you are uncertain about.”
The Teaching Notes in the Teacher Edition provide a list of exercises to assist students in interacting meaningfully with new words, including but not limited to: “Write example and nonexample sentences that use the new words. Answer hypothetical situations that use the new words. Craft analogies. Connect the meaning of the words to texts or topics they have previously studied.”
Additional teacher guidance in the Teaching Notes includes reminders of the importance of using words in meaningful contexts: “These opportunities provide students, particularly English learners, a tremendous chance to increase their cognitive academic language proficiency (CALP). Often, students, particularly English learners, employ basic interpersonal communicative skills (BICS).” Teacher guidance also notes that “You might combine new vocabulary with sentence starters, such as those found in the Academic Discussion Reference Guide, to provide opportunities for English learners to practice using academic language in the classroom.”
Indicator 3r
Materials provide a balance of images or information about people, representing various demographic and physical characteristics.
Indicator 3s
Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning.
Indicator 3t
Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning.
Indicator 3u
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Indicator 3v
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Criterion 3.4: Intentional Design
The program includes a visual design that is engaging and references or integrates digital technology, when applicable, with guidance for teachers.
The materials reviewed for Grade 9 integrate technology such as interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic software in ways that engage students in the grade-level/series standards, when applicable.
Materials include a visual design that is engaging and references or integrates digital technology with guidance for teachers. Materials include a Remote Learning Guide with details to assist educators, and local customization for asynchronous and synchronous learning is available. The Teaching Notes in the Teacher Edition and student-facing materials include guidance when teachers and students collaborate using digital tools. The visual design of the materials is not distracting and the layout of the materials is consistent across units and each grade level. Most organizational features in the materials are clear, accurate, and error-free. Materials provide guidance on the use of technology to support and enhance student learning.
Indicator 3w
Materials integrate technology such as interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic software in ways that engage students in the grade-level/series standards, when applicable.
Indicator 3x
Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable.
Indicator 3y
The visual design (whether in print or digital) supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject, and is neither distracting nor chaotic.
Indicator 3z
Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable.