Why Instructional Materials Matter
Instructional materials can have as large an impact on student outcomes as teacher quality. However, schools, districts, and states lack trusted, transparent information about the quality of the materials and tools they use to guide instruction. Only 37 percent of teachers believe that their district or school's instructional materials are aligned with the CCSS. Current state adoption processes yield inconsistent findings and provide limited evidence to support districts in selecting materials.
Due to the lack of information, selection decisions often privilege factors other than alignment or quality. 90 percent of districts report identifying or developing CCSS-aligned materials as a challenge. In one study, the average cost-effectiveness ratio of switching to higher quality curriculum was almost 40 times that of class-size reduction.
Learn More About Why Instructional Materials Matter
- Don't Forget Curriculum, Brown Center Letters on Education, Brookings Institute
- Choosing Blindly: Instructional Materials, Teacher Effectiveness, and the Common Core, Brown Center on Education Policy at Brookings Institute
- The Hidden Value of Curriculum, Center for American Progress
- Implementation of K-12 State Standards for Mathematics and English Language Arts and Literacy: Findings from the American Teacher Panel
- Teaching Higher: Educators' Perceptions of Common Core Implementation
- Listening to and Learning from Teachers: A Summary of Focus Groups on the Common Core and Assessments
Learn more from our content reviewers about why instructional materials matter and how EdReports supports educators nationwide to seek, identify, and demand high quality, aligned materials.